Skip to main content

2019 JSWE Awards


Best Reviewer

Congratulations to Ram Cnaan (University of Pennsylvania) and Barbara P. Early (The Catholic University of America, retired), who have been selected as the Journal of Social Work Education (JSWE) Best Reviewers of 2019! Each year, the recipients of the Best Reviewer awards are selected by the JSWE Editorial Advisory Board to recognize manuscript reviewers who have demonstrated exceptional service in responsiveness to requests for review, timeliness in submitting completed reviews, and quality of written reviews. Dr. Cnaan and Dr. Early will be honored at the Membership Meeting at the CSWE 2019 Annual Program Meeting, Friday, October 25, from 5:30 pm–6:30 pm腾博会网页大厅 in Denver, CO. The Best Reviewer Awards are sponsored this year by the University of Utah.

腾博会网页大厅CSWE and the JSWE Editorial Advisory Board would like to thank all the dedicated professionals who generously donate their time and expertise to review manuscripts and thus contribute to the value and success of the journal.

 

Best Articles of Volume 54

The criteria for choosing the Best Articles published in JSWE include the importance and timeliness of the content, originality of thought, innovative conceptualization of the topic, and presentation of conclusions and/or recommendations that add significantly to the professional knowledge base and to social work education. The award winners for this year will be honored at the Membership Meeting at the CSWE 2019 Annual Program Meeting in Denver, CO. The Best Article Awards are sponsored by Arizona State University. The award-winning articles are available at Taylor & Francis Online for  through June 2020.


Best Empirical Article

腾博会网页大厅David McCarty-Caplan. "." 54: 448–463. doi:10.1080/10437797.2018.1453904


This exploratory study examined MSW education’s organizational-level lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) competence. Data were gathered from a sample of MSW program directors, faculty members, and students (N=1385) from 34 MSW programs in the United States. Hierarchical linear modeling analyzed differences in perceptions of organizational LGBT competence between MSW programs and among participants in the same program. Results showed organizational LGBT competence varied significantly among MSW programs and indicated program directors, faculty members, and students had different perceptions of the competence of their shared program. Specifically, directors rated the LGBT competence of their program higher than faculty, and faculty rated their program higher than students did. Implications for research and suggestions for social work education are discussed.
 


Best Conceptual Article

Timothy B Leduc. "." 54: 412–425. doi:10.1080/10437797.2018.1434445

Social work is being challenged to situate its theories and practice within the lands it finds itself on in North America. This article considers the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s calls for change from the perspective of how social workers are educated in relation to land, from Indigenous views on its colonial conversions to the land’s role in healing. The discussion is grounded in a course I teach on Reconciliation and Indigenous-Social Work Relations on the Haudenosaunee lands of the Grand River in Ontario. Social work students consider their vocation in relation to a truth-telling process that is a first step for reconciling with Indigenous nations and land. The article concludes with general implications for social work educators.
 


Best Teaching Note

Hye-Kyung Kang & Peggy O’Neill. "." 54: 187–293. doi:10.1080/10437797.2017.1341857

Discussions of power and privilege, oppression, and structural inequities in classrooms can produce complex understanding and critical analysis when facilitated effectively. In this article we present the critical conversations model for facilitating conversations that open up space for discussing such issues and encourage the development of critical consciousness and reflection through experiential learning. The model provides flexible scaffolding for instructors to use to navigate their way through classroom tensions and capitalize on spontaneous learning opportunities. Theoretical underpinnings of the model are explained, followed by a description of the model. Implications for social work education and next steps are discussed.

天天棋牌app 光彩娱乐 天游app注册 同创娱乐官方 金豪国际 通宝手机娱乐 富豪国际app 完美娱乐网